Today, Monday, the government has to lay its cards on the table.
Federal Judge Loren AliKhan, of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, ordered it to hand over on October 26 the first batch of documents about its plans to deploy federal agents at polling places for the 2026 elections. The second batch is due Wednesday, October 28: the threat assessments that, according to the court, determine whether agents may go to a voting location or not.
Note this carefully: the order does not ban anything yet. It is not a ruling on whether such deployments are legal. It is expedited discovery — the handover of evidence — inside several consolidated lawsuits, eight days before the November 3 election. The judge accepted the plaintiffs’ argument that the issue cannot wait until after voting, because the harm they allege — that the presence of agents would intimidate voters — would happen precisely while people are voting.
Who sued? The list says a lot about the case. The city of Denver, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) and UnidosUS, the civil rights organization NAACP, unions and Democratic congressional leaders. Their argument, in short: that the government adopted a policy of sending FBI and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to the polls, and that such a presence would intimidate voters and violate the Voting Rights Act.
The government answers the opposite, also in short: that the plaintiffs point to no policy or statement showing that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intends to deploy armed agents at polling places. Their fears, it says, are speculative.
There is also an earlier statement that carries weight in the record. Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin said in September that ICE would not patrol the polls and that its agents would only go to a voting center in the face of a threat or to arrest someone under a court warrant. That is the official version as of today. What the judge now wants to see is whether the internal documents say the same thing.
The underlying law leaves little room for interpretation. A federal law bars government officials from bringing troops or armed men to places where voting takes place, except to repel armed enemies of the country. That is the rule the plaintiffs invoke and that the court will have to apply when the time comes to decide the merits. For now, what is on the table is paperwork, not a ban.
And there are concrete episodes the lawsuits cite — not rumors, dated events. In Florida, Monroe County Supervisor of Elections Sherri Hodies notified the FBI and is investigating the detention of a man by masked Border Patrol agents last Tuesday next to an early voting center in the Florida Keys. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) told U.S. media that it was an immigration operation against that person, who had parked his vehicle in a spot adjacent to the center. The lawsuits also cite earlier ICE interventions near voting centers during the primaries in San Antonio, Texas, in May, and in Ventura County, California, in June.
What happens now, in order? This Monday the first delivery is due. Wednesday, the second, with the threat assessments. After that, the court will see what was handed over and what is missing — and whether anything more is needed before November 3. None of that changes your right to vote tomorrow, or where you vote.
If you go to vote and see federal agents near your polling place, the practical advice is simple and holds in every state: vote first. Do not confront anyone. Then tell the election official at the site and your county elections office, with the exact time and place. Local officials — not federal agents — are the ones who run voting at your polling place.
Two stories from this same week help explain why this case got this far, this fast: the 20,000-name list California refuses to use to set ballots aside, and the deadlines hitting today in two states with more than 29 million votes already cast. Read them here:
https://actualusa.com/en/justice-california-20000-name-list-ballots-48-hours/
https://actualusa.com/en/two-states-deadline-today-early-votes-pass-29-million/
https://actualusa.com/en/28-million-voted-texas-tied-early-voting-november-3/
Official sources
- EFE via Infobae, October 26, 2026: https://www.infobae.com/america/agencias/2026/10/26/una-jueza-de-eeuu-ordena-al-gobierno-trump-informar-sobre-agentes-federales-en-las-urnas/
- LULAC lawsuit against DHS (filed September 10, 2026, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia): https://democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/1-2026-09-10-Complaint.pdf
Comentarios